Tomb of Ramesses IV The pharaoh Ramesses IV was buried in Tomb KV2, located in the Valley of the Kings, Egypt. The tombs of Ramesses II and VII are on either side. Ramesses died at the age of 27 in 1148 BC. He is connected to the Temple of Khonsu at Karnak. Coordinates 25.741530,32.602080 Description The tomb is of similar design to others in that it has a corridor to the burial chamber with side rooms. It is thought to be about 75 metres long and declines about 10 metres from the entrance. Chamber E, as the antechamber, has stars painted on the ceiling. Chamber K is built with side rooms, and the burial chamber J has a vaulted ceiling with astrological patterns along with the sarcophagus. Coptic monks were said to have lived in the tomb, and in the 19th century, explorers like Jean-François Champollion had camped there. Earlier, Romans were said to have left what is considered as graffiti in the tomb. Measurements These are the tombs' measurements in metres, including the a...
Palace, Henan Province, China
A 5000-year-old ancient palace has been discovered in Henan Province, China. The ancient palace was found in the Shuanghuaishu area and is thought to date to China's ancient civilization.
The discovery of this palace out dates the oldest palace built in China by 1000 years.
Shuanghuaishu district is located in the Heluo district of Gongyi city of Henan, on the south bank of the Yellow River. It was the capital of the ancient Heluo Kingdom, dating from about 5300 years ago and the origins of the Chinese civilization.
A 5000-year-old ancient palace has been discovered in Henan Province, China. The ancient palace was found in the Shuanghuaishu area and is thought to date to China's ancient civilization.
The discovery of this palace out dates the oldest palace built in China by 1000 years.
Shuanghuaishu district is located in the Heluo district of Gongyi city of Henan, on the south bank of the Yellow River. It was the capital of the ancient Heluo Kingdom, dating from about 5300 years ago and the origins of the Chinese civilization.
Coordinates
34.909172,113.513347
Description
Due to the preservation of the site the palace can be described clearly with the western half of the platform as a rectangular courtyard, the plan points to a typical ancient palace layout in which the administrative area of the royal court sits in front of the residences.
The previous oldest ancient palace, the Erlitou ruins, served as the capital for the middle and late periods of the Xia Dynasty 2070 bc-1600 bc.
It is possible that the latitude for the location is connected to the tilt and the ratios. This then uses circumference and radius.
The longitudinal coordinates suggest kms/degree
(the 111.3194kms/° for longitude) but is between 245kms/265kms too far west when using modern-day coordinates.
40075÷360=111.3194
40007÷360=111.1306
111.3194=245kms (west)
111.1306=265kms (north)
Currently, the longitudinal coordinates are from Greenwich, but a location about 250kms east would equate as 111.3194kms. The latitude could fall anywhere along this line.
Tilt of site
16-7=9°
9÷1.55=5.80645
5.80645×1000=5806.45
5806.45−1985=3821.45
3821.45−290=3531
Area of site
110m by 100m
Minus 50m by 20m
11000-1000=10000m²
Ratios
110÷100=1.1
50÷20=2.5
1000÷11000=0.0909
0.0909×6370=579.0909
579.0909×2.5=1447.72
Difference in minutes of a day
1447.72-1440=7.72
7.72÷1.55=4.9806
4.98065×1000=4980.65
4980.65−1985=2995 bc
The following shows that when using minutes in a day, the ratio number reduces to 0.0904, but this number must be reduced to 0.09 so that it connects to the latitude circumference.
1440÷2.5=576
576÷6370=0.0904
40007×0.0909=3643.182
40007×0.0904=3617.58
40007×0.09=3600
The difference between the two years is 536, and the two numbers can be used so as to give 3600 plus 24 or 43. The 24 is again achieved by using obliquity.
3531−2955=536
40075×0.0904=3624
40075×0.0909=3643
2995+1985=4980
4980÷10250=0.4859
0.4859×1.2=0.583
0.583+23.43=24.013
Circumference kms per degree
40075÷360=111.3194
40007÷360=111.1306
Conclusion
There is a possible connection to the Dolmen Lo Morrell dos Fados in France as both sites use the same reduction in latitude/longitude from what is used in the 21st century and this suggests the Palace in Henan Province, China was constructed first.
The area connects to the date of 2995 bc as a subtraction from minutes in a day derived from the ratios and not the tilt of the building. Tilt gives a date of 3531 bc. This though conflicts with the current dating of the site but the same numbers are used for the Dolmen Lo Morrell dos Fados and connecting sites (these though are also dated to 3500-3000 bc), so it is Dolmen Lo Morrell dos Fados theme that suggests 2900-2700 bc with it's use of fractions and reduction to an unfinished calculation.
This suggests a build of 3531 bc or around 2900-2700 bc, the tilt favouring 3531 bc and use of the same numbers and calculations favouring nearer 2700 bc.
The use of a defined longitudinal marker had been of some speculation around 2900-2700 bc, and with the building of these monuments demonstrates this, not only showing construction was after but fairly soon afterwards.
34.909172,113.513347
Description
Due to the preservation of the site the palace can be described clearly with the western half of the platform as a rectangular courtyard, the plan points to a typical ancient palace layout in which the administrative area of the royal court sits in front of the residences.
The previous oldest ancient palace, the Erlitou ruins, served as the capital for the middle and late periods of the Xia Dynasty 2070 bc-1600 bc.
It is possible that the latitude for the location is connected to the tilt and the ratios. This then uses circumference and radius.
The longitudinal coordinates suggest kms/degree
(the 111.3194kms/° for longitude) but is between 245kms/265kms too far west when using modern-day coordinates.
40075÷360=111.3194
40007÷360=111.1306
111.3194=245kms (west)
111.1306=265kms (north)
Currently, the longitudinal coordinates are from Greenwich, but a location about 250kms east would equate as 111.3194kms. The latitude could fall anywhere along this line.
Tilt of site
16-7=9°
9÷1.55=5.80645
5.80645×1000=5806.45
5806.45−1985=3821.45
3821.45−290=3531
Area of site
110m by 100m
Minus 50m by 20m
11000-1000=10000m²
Ratios
110÷100=1.1
50÷20=2.5
1000÷11000=0.0909
0.0909×6370=579.0909
579.0909×2.5=1447.72
Difference in minutes of a day
1447.72-1440=7.72
7.72÷1.55=4.9806
4.98065×1000=4980.65
4980.65−1985=2995 bc
The following shows that when using minutes in a day, the ratio number reduces to 0.0904, but this number must be reduced to 0.09 so that it connects to the latitude circumference.
1440÷2.5=576
576÷6370=0.0904
40007×0.0909=3643.182
40007×0.0904=3617.58
40007×0.09=3600
The difference between the two years is 536, and the two numbers can be used so as to give 3600 plus 24 or 43. The 24 is again achieved by using obliquity.
3531−2955=536
40075×0.0904=3624
40075×0.0909=3643
2995+1985=4980
4980÷10250=0.4859
0.4859×1.2=0.583
0.583+23.43=24.013
Circumference kms per degree
40075÷360=111.3194
40007÷360=111.1306
Conclusion
There is a possible connection to the Dolmen Lo Morrell dos Fados in France as both sites use the same reduction in latitude/longitude from what is used in the 21st century and this suggests the Palace in Henan Province, China was constructed first.
The area connects to the date of 2995 bc as a subtraction from minutes in a day derived from the ratios and not the tilt of the building. Tilt gives a date of 3531 bc. This though conflicts with the current dating of the site but the same numbers are used for the Dolmen Lo Morrell dos Fados and connecting sites (these though are also dated to 3500-3000 bc), so it is Dolmen Lo Morrell dos Fados theme that suggests 2900-2700 bc with it's use of fractions and reduction to an unfinished calculation.
This suggests a build of 3531 bc or around 2900-2700 bc, the tilt favouring 3531 bc and use of the same numbers and calculations favouring nearer 2700 bc.
The use of a defined longitudinal marker had been of some speculation around 2900-2700 bc, and with the building of these monuments demonstrates this, not only showing construction was after but fairly soon afterwards.
The associated number 24 probably represents hours in day. The coordinate value appears by setting a marker 111.3194° towards the west.
This demonstrates that some discussion occurred with groups of people who were aware of the construction, including both the number 24 and angle 111.3194°.
At maximum tilt, Dolmen Lo Morrell dos Fados is 843 km away at an angle of 13° (190kms east). Including tilt at 7.72° decreases the distance to 840kms and 300 km towards the east.
Due to the error ratio and use of the difference from Greenwich as used in the 21st century, the marker builders of the Dolmen Lo Morrell dos Fado used must have been Greenwich (within a few kilometres).
There is a possibility that the builders of the palace in Henan Province, China, were using coordinates from locations in Europe/Africa.
At 27.19,2.679948 ((34.909172-7.72),113.513347), there is a location in Algeria near In Salah and is near a known location of settlement during the 1st dynasty Egypt. The route travelled used mountain ranges from the coast, then southeast towards Sudan.
This would then make it 111.3194° near to that location at a tilt of 7.72°, because it is still 300kms east it is possible that obliquity is included as an extra 54kms.
The location in Algeria, which is 2.679° east of the current marker, can connect to a 2995 bc build by its emphasis on Dolmen Lo Morrell dos Fados being built 2700 bc.
At maximum tilt, Dolmen Lo Morrell dos Fados is 843 km away at an angle of 13° (190kms east). Including tilt at 7.72° decreases the distance to 840kms and 300 km towards the east.
Due to the error ratio and use of the difference from Greenwich as used in the 21st century, the marker builders of the Dolmen Lo Morrell dos Fado used must have been Greenwich (within a few kilometres).
There is a possibility that the builders of the palace in Henan Province, China, were using coordinates from locations in Europe/Africa.
At 27.19,2.679948 ((34.909172-7.72),113.513347), there is a location in Algeria near In Salah and is near a known location of settlement during the 1st dynasty Egypt. The route travelled used mountain ranges from the coast, then southeast towards Sudan.
This would then make it 111.3194° near to that location at a tilt of 7.72°, because it is still 300kms east it is possible that obliquity is included as an extra 54kms.
The location in Algeria, which is 2.679° east of the current marker, can connect to a 2995 bc build by its emphasis on Dolmen Lo Morrell dos Fados being built 2700 bc.
This is by multiplying 2.679° by 111.3194° and adding to 2700 bc.
This suggests two different settlements or a maker point or river nearer Greenwich that visually looked like a point to measure from.
111.3194×2.6799=298.324
298.324+2700=2998.324
Comments
Post a Comment