Tomb of Ramesses IV The pharaoh Ramesses IV was buried in Tomb KV2, located in the Valley of the Kings, Egypt. The tombs of Ramesses II and VII are on either side. Ramesses died at the age of 27 in 1148 BC. He is connected to the Temple of Khonsu at Karnak. Coordinates 25.741530,32.602080 Description The tomb is of similar design to others in that it has a corridor to the burial chamber with side rooms. It is thought to be about 75 metres long and declines about 10 metres from the entrance. Chamber E, as the antechamber, has stars painted on the ceiling. Chamber K is built with side rooms, and the burial chamber J has a vaulted ceiling with astrological patterns along with the sarcophagus. Coptic monks were said to have lived in the tomb, and in the 19th century, explorers like Jean-François Champollion had camped there. Earlier, Romans were said to have left what is considered as graffiti in the tomb. Measurements These are the tombs' measurements in metres, including the a...
Dolmen de Keriaval
The Dolmen de Keriaval is a dolmen near Carnac in Morbihan, France, it is located in a wood northeast of the hamlet of Keriaval and is 2.743km away from Carnac through an angle of 40° about an arc due to the size of the site.
Other sites nearby include the Mané-Kerioned dolmen which is located 175m to the west at 7°, the Kluder-Yer dolmen 422m to the north at 82°, the Crucuny alignment about 400 m to the north-east, menhirs from Kériaval about 130 m to the east, alignment of Kériaval about 110 m to the southwest and the Dolmen de Kéric-la-Lande about 1200m at 4.5° towards the north. Dolmen de Kermario on the Carnac site is 2550m at 29.5° towards the south.
Coordinates
47.615349,-3.083279
Altitude
15m (49ft)
Dolmen de Keriaval can be best described as two dolmens both not in good condition. Both dolmens point towards the southwest with one at 45° and the other at 63°.
Analysis
Although unlike the typical shaped dolmen like the Dolmen de Kermario and Dolmen Crucuno, there is still a similarity with the Dolmen de Keriaval.
The former had distinct alignment, which gave a date but also a connection to the number 11, which could have attracted the ancient Egyptians who quite possibly adjusted certain monuments in the area.
The angle between them is 18° and subtracted from maximum tilt leaves 2°, 2° as a year is 695 ad.
1985-1290=695 ad
If it were the ancient Egyptians, then a connection to the numbers 11 or 5.5 would exist. Instead, there is a connection to the date 695 ad by the difference in angles multipled by the coordinates.
2×47=94
2×3=6
Longitude with latitude, this suggests that if the difference in angle is a year, then the difference multipled the coordinates is also the year.
The altitude is 15m at the location, and the following shows that if three multipled by altitude is 45° then a number multipled by 47 gives the 63°.
(3)×15=45
(47×0.0894)×15=63
This number multipled by year gives.
0.0894×1290=115.33
The two angles dividing height in metres (146.4m) then subtracted give the following.
3.254-2.324=0.93
0.93×1000=930
If the coordinates multipled equal 141, then π multipled by each angle gives 141 and 0.05.
47×3=141
141−141.372=0.372
π×45=141.372
π÷63=0.05
This shows that these two angles and π could indicate that this might be aligned as if on an arc, this would be similar to the distance away from Carnac.
The coordinates multipled by altitude give 115.33, the two angles divided by height, then multipled by 1000 gives 930 and π multipled by the angles, which gives the coordinates and 0.05.
Conclusion
This, in total, suggests that although the ancient Egyptians were thought to have adjusted monuments in this case it was another group of people. This might be them demonstrating that they could also build a monument and connect it to the ancient Egyptians. In doing so, they might have destroyed other dolmens either using the same site or erecting them at these coordinates.
This then suggests the arc is the arc towards Carnac a distance of 2.743kms, the 2 could be the 2° and instead of the year 695 ad, the year of 743 bc is correct. (The 695 was already used as a difference from 1985).
Archeology77 ©
Comments
Post a Comment