Gorsedd Circle The Gorsedd Circle is a stone circle in Fishguard, Wales. The Gorsedd Stones are a Welsh tradition of modern stone circles constructed for the National Eisteddfod of Wales. These stone circles can be found at several locations, including Aberdare Park and Anglesey. They are typically 20 metres wide and have 12 stones on the circumference with a level stone in the circle. A further stone is usually set back from the circumference; the central stone is called the Logan Stone. Coordinates 51.996431,-4.975040 Stone Circle Gorsedd Circle is a typical stone circle but has 13 stones on the circumference with one inset. It was erected in 1936 and has the names of the parishes inscribed on each stone. Ceremony During the opening ceremony, the Archdruid stands on the Logan Stone facing the Stone of the Covenant. Two stones mark the entrance and are called the Portal Stones. These mar k the midsummer and midwinter sunrises. Gorsedd Circle (no edit) Archeology7...
Menhirs de Kerderff
Menhirs de Kerderff are similar to the The Pipers, St Buryan, but are in the area of Brittany where the Alignements du Vieux-Moulin, Carnac and Gravinis are located.
The Pipers suggested to a date of 1921 bc using a stone circle that was built before it, and the Alignements du Vieux-Moulin suggested a number '1' but might have been altered possibly from something else.
Menhirs de Kerderff
They are two separate stones separated by 50m with a height of 3m and 5.8m.
Like many of these stones, they had been worked to give a slightly pointed shape.
Assuming these two stones were east/west when built, then a date can be derived from the angle. They are currently at 9° east/west.
Date
9÷1.55=5.80645
5.80645×1000=5806.45
5805.45-1985=3821.45 bc
Obliquity
2.8÷4.8=0.5833
0.5833×41000=23916.66
Latitude
cos(47.59)×40007=26981.97
For latitude to equal 23917, the latitude would be 53.286°, which would put it near Heswall, Liverpool.
cos(53.286)×40007=23917
For the following number to equal '0', which would be what the sum would equate to, an accurate distance between the two stones could be derived.
(53.286×164)−6642−1985=111.904
(53.286×distance in ft)−6642−1985=0
This would be 161.9 ft or 49.34708952m.
(53.286×161.8999365)−6642−1985=0
From the following, the angle 10.958° which is derived from 190.958°-180° reaches a point at the Alignements de Kermario only 2km away.
At this location, there is a group of three stones and a group of five/eight stones.
((49.34708952×3)−286)−53=−190.958
((49.34708952×5.8)−286)−53=−52.7868
((49.34708952×5.8)−286)
−190.958=−190.745
Coordinates
53.286
52.7868
47.593978
Coordinate differences
53.286-52.7868=0.4992
52.7868-47.593978=5.192822
10.5545:1 is the ratio of the above coordinates. In a triangle, these ratios give a perimeter of 10.908 and an angle of 5.491° or 0.095838 radians.
Conclusion
As the angle produced from putting the more accurate separation distance in and then multiplying by height and by the new latitude gives a location in the Alignements de Kermario 2kms away, where there are stones in the area in groups, suggests this is correct.
The 9° gives a date of 3821 bc, but there are three coordinate numbers, and the ratio between them is 10.5545:1. If this was used for a date, it would equate to 4824 bc.
This happens to be a difference of 1000 years and an angle of 1.5545.
(These are conversion factors numbers which derive a year).
10901 years bc happens to be minimum tilt and could be connected to 10.9° as a direct angle.
12886−1985=10901 bc
As the 10.958° was derived from the distance between the stones, their height and the latitude, with this aligning with the stones in groups of their height it is possible this is an east/west for the 9° or 9° angle aligning at maximum tilt.
This then suggests east/west 9° is maximum tilt, minimum tilt subtract maximum tilt equals 10901 bc (current numbers) but if the angle 10.958° is used as a year 10958 it would suggest tilt duration is 25886 or 2×58 years more than current numbers.
10958+1985=12943
12943×2=25886
25886-25772=114 (2×58)
If using the ratio to find the increase in tilt angle, then 20.088° is produced, but if using the two angles of 9° and 10.958° as a reduction from 180° then the angle 20.0463° is produced.
(25886÷25772)×20=20.088°
9+10.958=19.958°
(25886÷25772)×19.958=20.0463°
This probably suggests the 19.958° is correct as it connects with 180° and thus tilt duration is 20.0463° or roughly 20.05°.
At Giza, it is Khafre's pyramid, which is aligned north/south at maximum tilt (1984.75) with Khufu's pyramid forward by 0.05° (or 0.052°). This aligns them at 2046 ad so as to include the cubit even though they used metres and feet.
This is 61 years but could be perceived as 58+π and as such, the ancient Egyptians could have copied this monument connecting to the cubit.
The number 25886 appeared before in about the 25th/26th century bc in another monument, but most monuments aligned at 1985.
Any error made in early monuments and copied show that other groups of people interpreted those monuments in the same way, and errors were carried through, but also it shows that they arrived there after those monuments were built.
Menhirs de Kerderff
Archeology77 ©
Menhirs de Kerderff are similar to the The Pipers, St Buryan, but are in the area of Brittany where the Alignements du Vieux-Moulin, Carnac and Gravinis are located.
The Pipers suggested to a date of 1921 bc using a stone circle that was built before it, and the Alignements du Vieux-Moulin suggested a number '1' but might have been altered possibly from something else.
Menhirs de Kerderff
They are two separate stones separated by 50m with a height of 3m and 5.8m.
Like many of these stones, they had been worked to give a slightly pointed shape.
Assuming these two stones were east/west when built, then a date can be derived from the angle. They are currently at 9° east/west.
Date
9÷1.55=5.80645
5.80645×1000=5806.45
5805.45-1985=3821.45 bc
Obliquity
2.8÷4.8=0.5833
0.5833×41000=23916.66
Latitude
cos(47.59)×40007=26981.97
For latitude to equal 23917, the latitude would be 53.286°, which would put it near Heswall, Liverpool.
cos(53.286)×40007=23917
For the following number to equal '0', which would be what the sum would equate to, an accurate distance between the two stones could be derived.
(53.286×164)−6642−1985=111.904
(53.286×distance in ft)−6642−1985=0
This would be 161.9 ft or 49.34708952m.
(53.286×161.8999365)−6642−1985=0
From the following, the angle 10.958° which is derived from 190.958°-180° reaches a point at the Alignements de Kermario only 2km away.
At this location, there is a group of three stones and a group of five/eight stones.
((49.34708952×3)−286)−53=−190.958
((49.34708952×5.8)−286)−53=−52.7868
((49.34708952×5.8)−286)
−190.958=−190.745
Coordinates
53.286
52.7868
47.593978
Coordinate differences
53.286-52.7868=0.4992
52.7868-47.593978=5.192822
10.5545:1 is the ratio of the above coordinates. In a triangle, these ratios give a perimeter of 10.908 and an angle of 5.491° or 0.095838 radians.
Conclusion
As the angle produced from putting the more accurate separation distance in and then multiplying by height and by the new latitude gives a location in the Alignements de Kermario 2kms away, where there are stones in the area in groups, suggests this is correct.
The 9° gives a date of 3821 bc, but there are three coordinate numbers, and the ratio between them is 10.5545:1. If this was used for a date, it would equate to 4824 bc.
This happens to be a difference of 1000 years and an angle of 1.5545.
(These are conversion factors numbers which derive a year).
10901 years bc happens to be minimum tilt and could be connected to 10.9° as a direct angle.
12886−1985=10901 bc
As the 10.958° was derived from the distance between the stones, their height and the latitude, with this aligning with the stones in groups of their height it is possible this is an east/west for the 9° or 9° angle aligning at maximum tilt.
This then suggests east/west 9° is maximum tilt, minimum tilt subtract maximum tilt equals 10901 bc (current numbers) but if the angle 10.958° is used as a year 10958 it would suggest tilt duration is 25886 or 2×58 years more than current numbers.
10958+1985=12943
12943×2=25886
25886-25772=114 (2×58)
If using the ratio to find the increase in tilt angle, then 20.088° is produced, but if using the two angles of 9° and 10.958° as a reduction from 180° then the angle 20.0463° is produced.
(25886÷25772)×20=20.088°
9+10.958=19.958°
(25886÷25772)×19.958=20.0463°
This probably suggests the 19.958° is correct as it connects with 180° and thus tilt duration is 20.0463° or roughly 20.05°.
At Giza, it is Khafre's pyramid, which is aligned north/south at maximum tilt (1984.75) with Khufu's pyramid forward by 0.05° (or 0.052°). This aligns them at 2046 ad so as to include the cubit even though they used metres and feet.
This is 61 years but could be perceived as 58+π and as such, the ancient Egyptians could have copied this monument connecting to the cubit.
The number 25886 appeared before in about the 25th/26th century bc in another monument, but most monuments aligned at 1985.
Any error made in early monuments and copied show that other groups of people interpreted those monuments in the same way, and errors were carried through, but also it shows that they arrived there after those monuments were built.
Menhirs de Kerderff
Archeology77 ©
Comments
Post a Comment