Gorsedd Circle The Gorsedd Cir cle is a stone circle in Fishguard, Wa les. T he Gorsedd Stone s are a Welsh tradition of modern stone circles constructed for the National Eisteddfod of Wales. These stone circles can be found at several locations, including Ab erdare Park and A nglesey. They are typically 20 meters wide and have 12 stones on the circumference with a level stone in the circle. A further stone is usually set back from the circumference, the central stone is called the Logan Stone. Coordinates 51.996431,-4.975040 Stone Circle Gorsedd Circle is a typical stone circle but has 13 stones on the circumference with one inset. It was erected in 1936 and has the names of the parishes inscribed on each stone. Ceremony During the opening ceremony, the Archdruid stands on the Logan Stone facing the Stone of the Covenant. Two stones mark the entrance and are called the Portal Stones. These mar k the midsummer and midwinter sunrises. Gorsedd Circle (no edit) Archeology77 ©
Gravinis and pyramid connection.
It has been suggested that the ancient Egyptians erected the Devil’s Arrows and might have adjusted the Devil’s Quoites also including some adjustments to Gravinis, so connecting the sites by 455 miles and increasing it's circumference. How much adjustment to the size of Gravinis is only speculation but adjustment of the tidal stones can be suggested that they added in two loops equalling a number 8, an indication of the angle offset to align at peak precession. Before a straight line, a tidal marker would have been the most likely constructed in neolithic times during the building of Gravinis.
Converting it to an 8 would give them the 8 from the 8.2° current angle (0.2 could be represented elsewhere in the monument). The 328 ft circumference would also connect with the Devil's Arrows.
Before continuing, the question would be, why make a connection when neolithic constructions were rarely connected by distance only by angle?
Although from a neolithic perspective they could have just built both, aligning with the Devil’s Arrows as an alternative site for construction but not limited to these two (connected together by height, with distance at 455 miles). It can be said that a decision was made and a site nearer was chosen. This was partly a construction issue like an 11m capstone.
For the Egyptians, they must have seen a connection to their roots as neolithic people migrated through Italy, Sicily into Algeria, and then on to Sudan. As these people accumulated in the Nile area they progressed along the Nile into Egypt, later as the construction of the pyramids were progressing fewer people would have been required, then sending people off on expeditions around Europe and Africa.
Further, the inclusion of Orion star measurements was almost exclusively for the Egyptians, with other groups preferring individual stars or different constellations. The connection with Orion was only when building the Great Pyramids had started, but they were connecting their builds, old with the newer and by putting in their numbers, could make their builds appear older.
Before continuing, the question would be, why make a connection when neolithic constructions were rarely connected by distance only by angle?
Although from a neolithic perspective they could have just built both, aligning with the Devil’s Arrows as an alternative site for construction but not limited to these two (connected together by height, with distance at 455 miles). It can be said that a decision was made and a site nearer was chosen. This was partly a construction issue like an 11m capstone.
For the Egyptians, they must have seen a connection to their roots as neolithic people migrated through Italy, Sicily into Algeria, and then on to Sudan. As these people accumulated in the Nile area they progressed along the Nile into Egypt, later as the construction of the pyramids were progressing fewer people would have been required, then sending people off on expeditions around Europe and Africa.
Further, the inclusion of Orion star measurements was almost exclusively for the Egyptians, with other groups preferring individual stars or different constellations. The connection with Orion was only when building the Great Pyramids had started, but they were connecting their builds, old with the newer and by putting in their numbers, could make their builds appear older.
Interpretation of date on Gravinis
5510-855=4655 bcInstead of a date 4655 bc, this number could be coordinates 46° latitude and root 5 and forward aligned with peak precession. The use of the same two numbers together suggested a root used in neolithic times that continued into the early bronze age. The internal chamber is also 5.5m², its cap stone is 11m long, and a circumference of 328 ft, which might have been increased to this size.
These numbers have been measured at the pyramids as construction ratios (11 by 5.5). When the number 4655 is reduced to an angle ratio, it equates to 4.655, multiplying this by 1.55=7.21525.
A triangle using these numbers as sides has a perimeter of 7.21492, which is a difference to 3 decimal points. Numbers from coordinates differences, the coordinates of Gravinis 7.572507, -2.897910.
Instead of the use of root 5, a number with decimal point, 5,5, as 5.5−2.89791=2.60209.
The three sides of a 90° triangle would be 3.04033, 1.5725, and 2.60209.
Area=2.04589
Perimeter=7.21492
Semi perimeter=3.60746
It has also been suggested that the neolithic people were tracking glacial melt by erection of lines of stones. It is possible that they understood melt rates and total land/water ice ratios. They then allowed them to build a tomb that would still be above the water level at peak precession. The Cromlec de Er Lannic stones suggest a circle that is half beneath the water line, suggesting this.
The tilt was 10.35° difference in 4655 bc, and currently, the height above sea level is 11m (7.5m height of Gravinis).
10.35×100÷2=518
But peak precession was 1980’s so angle is 10.29°.
(10.29045+1.5725+3.04033+2.60209)×π−2.60209=52.3
This is 100 cubits.
(10.29045+1.5725+3.04033+2.60209)×π−3.04033=51.9
This is very near to 51.843° a 11×5.5 construction ratio, with an angle of 51° on the capstones on Khafre's pyramid with a depth of 0.860m and side area of 1.14m².
Both these numbers divided 11 are about 1.523, but 11m is a rough altitude above sea level, so using 10.99m equates nearer to 1+0.523.
7.21492
7.21525
Ratio
(7.21492−√(5.5)÷(7.21525)+√(5.5)))=6.969
=2511 bc
Conclusion
It is unlikely that the ancient Egyptians would have arrived in France or the British Isles before construction, but neolithic people arriving in Sudan passed on their understanding. The site Nabta Playa could just be one of these examples, a return after construction was completed and adjusting possible errors, which also happened to be uniquely ancient Egyptian.
Any connection to pyramid numbers would be the Egyptians making alterations, but it is possible that other groups of people copied their use of numbers.
It is likely that Gravinis and Cromlec de Er Lannic were built in 4655 bc as both a tomb and marker point. This would have been for the most important person at that time
Cairn Gavrinis
Archeology77 ©
Instead of the use of root 5, a number with decimal point, 5,5, as 5.5−2.89791=2.60209.
The three sides of a 90° triangle would be 3.04033, 1.5725, and 2.60209.
Area=2.04589
Perimeter=7.21492
Semi perimeter=3.60746
It has also been suggested that the neolithic people were tracking glacial melt by erection of lines of stones. It is possible that they understood melt rates and total land/water ice ratios. They then allowed them to build a tomb that would still be above the water level at peak precession. The Cromlec de Er Lannic stones suggest a circle that is half beneath the water line, suggesting this.
The tilt was 10.35° difference in 4655 bc, and currently, the height above sea level is 11m (7.5m height of Gravinis).
10.35×100÷2=518
But peak precession was 1980’s so angle is 10.29°.
(10.29045+1.5725+3.04033+2.60209)×π−2.60209=52.3
This is 100 cubits.
(10.29045+1.5725+3.04033+2.60209)×π−3.04033=51.9
This is very near to 51.843° a 11×5.5 construction ratio, with an angle of 51° on the capstones on Khafre's pyramid with a depth of 0.860m and side area of 1.14m².
Both these numbers divided 11 are about 1.523, but 11m is a rough altitude above sea level, so using 10.99m equates nearer to 1+0.523.
7.21492
7.21525
Ratio
(7.21492−√(5.5)÷(7.21525)+√(5.5)))=6.969
=2511 bc
Conclusion
It is unlikely that the ancient Egyptians would have arrived in France or the British Isles before construction, but neolithic people arriving in Sudan passed on their understanding. The site Nabta Playa could just be one of these examples, a return after construction was completed and adjusting possible errors, which also happened to be uniquely ancient Egyptian.
Any connection to pyramid numbers would be the Egyptians making alterations, but it is possible that other groups of people copied their use of numbers.
It is likely that Gravinis and Cromlec de Er Lannic were built in 4655 bc as both a tomb and marker point. This would have been for the most important person at that time
Cairn Gavrinis
Archeology77 ©
Comments
Post a Comment