Gorsedd Circle The Gorsedd Cir cle is a stone circle in Fishguard, Wa les. T he Gorsedd Stone s are a Welsh tradition of modern stone circles constructed for the National Eisteddfod of Wales. These stone circles can be found at several locations, including Ab erdare Park and A nglesey. They are typically 20 meters wide and have 12 stones on the circumference with a level stone in the circle. A further stone is usually set back from the circumference, the central stone is called the Logan Stone. Coordinates 51.996431,-4.975040 Stone Circle Gorsedd Circle is a typical stone circle but has 13 stones on the circumference with one inset. It was erected in 1936 and has the names of the parishes inscribed on each stone. Ceremony During the opening ceremony, the Archdruid stands on the Logan Stone facing the Stone of the Covenant. Two stones mark the entrance and are called the Portal Stones. These mar k the midsummer and midwinter sunrises. Gorsedd Circle (no edit) Archeology77 ©
Glaner Braut, Wildeshausen
Glaner Braut is a historical landmark just outside the town of Wildeshausen, Germany, named after the town of Glane and Braut, meaning bride in German.
Though to be a Neolithic grave and built between 3500-2800 bc, although only one body was found from the Iron Age along with pottery.
Four separate stone monuments exist within the site. The large is aligned currently at 10° with the slightly smaller at 60°, two further are at north and south to the main.
Coordinates 52.929785, 8.373635
Glaner Braut from the circular monument to the south aligns with the two main structures giving angles with their angular spacing distances, a further circular monument is north of Glaner Braut which also aligns similiarly, both align at 5°.
South monument
-89,46,31,16
45,15,15
45×15×15=10125
10125-10250=125
North monument
76,-55,-61,-45
49,6,16
49×6×16=4704
4704−1985=2719
Multiplying the two numbers
10125×4704=47628000
47628000×π=149627775
Semi-major axis
149598023-149627775=29752
Average orbital speed
29780
Ratio (0.656208°)
At location
cos(52.927)×40075=24158.5
Angle×length
(10×50)+(60×27)=2120
What seems like a possible date can be considered as the semi-major axis multiplied by pi and, when subtracted from current measurements, produces a number very near to current average orbital speed.
The multiplication by Pi suggests a circle. Although an orbit is rarely round, the difference off the current semi-major axis gives an orbital velocity, with the two being connected. A length of year might not be necessary if these are considered accurate. It also couldn't be used along with pi as the shape isn't round. Something like a polynomial whose roots would equal the semi-major axis and vertex equalled major axis.
Another consideration would be to use circumference, obliquity latitude, or ratio.
(The ratio suggests knowing the answer and is
1985+20+3600, interpreting as year of maximum tilt, maximum tilt, and one hour in seconds separation).
Multiplying circumference at that location by ratio.
24158.5×0.6562=15853
This number in minutes is equal to 11 days, 13 minutes, with 11 being 5 less than 16 (16° lowest angle, 5° smaller north/south monuments, normally this would be hours/minutes).
Assuming they measured from the lowest orbital point, this would put precession at about 84/85 days or 83.45° or 5hrs 33m 49s, making it 16hrs 46m 49s. Using, right ascension to find a possible constellation.
Ursa Major
α Ursae Majoris
Right ascension 11h 03m 43.67152s
Declination +61° 45′ 03.7249″
Polaris
Right ascension 02h 31m 49.09s
Declination +89° 15′ 50.8″
Eta Ursae Minoris
Right ascension 16h 17m 30.28696s
Declination +75° 45′ 19.1885″
Epsilon Ursae Minoris
Right ascension 16h 45m 58.24168s
Declination +82° 02′ 14.1233
Drift of Epsilon
+19.47×4704=0.0254°
Neither plus or minus is exactly the number but about 0° 1' 31.59" either way. A possible interpretation of precession a few hours either way could reduce this further.
The other stars connect slightly to their separation angles, making Epsilon in Ursa Minor the star and constellation most likely to connect with.
A nearer possibility is RW Ursae Minoris, which flared up as a supernova in 1956. If drift is taken away, then the two match almost exactly. This could be because it might be a binary with a small drift and might have gone supernova 4700 years ago.
The supernova is 1 arc second off, but this relies on precession, obliquity could also be used, but because their is a connection to other star's declinations, it is probably the star Ursa Minor.
The number 1÷0.6562 is also equal to 1.523 or 1+0.523 about the time that the Egyptians royal cubit was though to be used, along with it's connection to pi and the golden ratio with maximum tilt/year and 3600.
Glaner Braut
Archeology77 ©
Glaner Braut is a historical landmark just outside the town of Wildeshausen, Germany, named after the town of Glane and Braut, meaning bride in German.
Though to be a Neolithic grave and built between 3500-2800 bc, although only one body was found from the Iron Age along with pottery.
Four separate stone monuments exist within the site. The large is aligned currently at 10° with the slightly smaller at 60°, two further are at north and south to the main.
Coordinates 52.929785, 8.373635
Glaner Braut from the circular monument to the south aligns with the two main structures giving angles with their angular spacing distances, a further circular monument is north of Glaner Braut which also aligns similiarly, both align at 5°.
South monument
-89,46,31,16
45,15,15
45×15×15=10125
10125-10250=125
North monument
76,-55,-61,-45
49,6,16
49×6×16=4704
4704−1985=2719
Multiplying the two numbers
10125×4704=47628000
47628000×π=149627775
Semi-major axis
149598023-149627775=29752
Average orbital speed
29780
Ratio (0.656208°)
At location
cos(52.927)×40075=24158.5
Angle×length
(10×50)+(60×27)=2120
What seems like a possible date can be considered as the semi-major axis multiplied by pi and, when subtracted from current measurements, produces a number very near to current average orbital speed.
The multiplication by Pi suggests a circle. Although an orbit is rarely round, the difference off the current semi-major axis gives an orbital velocity, with the two being connected. A length of year might not be necessary if these are considered accurate. It also couldn't be used along with pi as the shape isn't round. Something like a polynomial whose roots would equal the semi-major axis and vertex equalled major axis.
Another consideration would be to use circumference, obliquity latitude, or ratio.
(The ratio suggests knowing the answer and is
1985+20+3600, interpreting as year of maximum tilt, maximum tilt, and one hour in seconds separation).
Multiplying circumference at that location by ratio.
24158.5×0.6562=15853
This number in minutes is equal to 11 days, 13 minutes, with 11 being 5 less than 16 (16° lowest angle, 5° smaller north/south monuments, normally this would be hours/minutes).
Assuming they measured from the lowest orbital point, this would put precession at about 84/85 days or 83.45° or 5hrs 33m 49s, making it 16hrs 46m 49s. Using, right ascension to find a possible constellation.
Ursa Major
α Ursae Majoris
Right ascension 11h 03m 43.67152s
Declination +61° 45′ 03.7249″
Polaris
Right ascension 02h 31m 49.09s
Declination +89° 15′ 50.8″
Eta Ursae Minoris
Right ascension 16h 17m 30.28696s
Declination +75° 45′ 19.1885″
Epsilon Ursae Minoris
Right ascension 16h 45m 58.24168s
Declination +82° 02′ 14.1233
Drift of Epsilon
+19.47×4704=0.0254°
Neither plus or minus is exactly the number but about 0° 1' 31.59" either way. A possible interpretation of precession a few hours either way could reduce this further.
The other stars connect slightly to their separation angles, making Epsilon in Ursa Minor the star and constellation most likely to connect with.
A nearer possibility is RW Ursae Minoris, which flared up as a supernova in 1956. If drift is taken away, then the two match almost exactly. This could be because it might be a binary with a small drift and might have gone supernova 4700 years ago.
The supernova is 1 arc second off, but this relies on precession, obliquity could also be used, but because their is a connection to other star's declinations, it is probably the star Ursa Minor.
The number 1÷0.6562 is also equal to 1.523 or 1+0.523 about the time that the Egyptians royal cubit was though to be used, along with it's connection to pi and the golden ratio with maximum tilt/year and 3600.
Glaner Braut
Archeology77 ©
Comments
Post a Comment