Tomb of Ramesses IV The pharaoh Ramesses IV was buried in Tomb KV2, located in the Valley of the Kings, Egypt. The tombs of Ramesses II and VII are on either side. Ramesses died at the age of 27 in 1148 BC. He is connected to the Temple of Khonsu at Karnak. Coordinates 25.741530,32.602080 Description The tomb is of similar design to others in that it has a corridor to the burial chamber with side rooms. It is thought to be about 75 metres long and declines about 10 metres from the entrance. Chamber E, as the antechamber, has stars painted on the ceiling. Chamber K is built with side rooms, and the burial chamber J has a vaulted ceiling with astrological patterns along with the sarcophagus. Coptic monks were said to have lived in the tomb, and in the 19th century, explorers like Jean-François Champollion had camped there. Earlier, Romans were said to have left what is considered as graffiti in the tomb. Measurements These are the tombs' measurements in metres, including the a...
Clava Cairns, Scotland
North (59°)
(1)
72,31,2,41-79,73,36,9,24,50
(41,29,39-60,6,37,27,33,26)
(7÷2)+(3÷1)+(1÷2)+(4÷1)+(7÷9)+(7÷3)+(3÷6)+(1÷9)+(2÷4)+(5)=20.222
(6÷2)+(3÷3)+(7÷2)+(7÷3)+(1÷6)+(6)+(9÷3)+(9÷2)+(1÷4)=23.75
(2)
40-75,69,35,3
65,6,34,32
4+(7÷5)+(6÷9)+(3÷5)+(1÷3)=7
(2÷3)+(4÷3)+(1÷6)+(5÷6)=3
South (54°)
(1)
55,82,73,45,17,11,39-68,80,50,13
27,25,28,28,28,27-29,32,30,37
(5÷5)+(8÷2)+(7÷3)+(4÷5)+(1÷7)+(1÷1)+(3÷9)+(6÷8)+(8)+(5)+(1÷3)=28.69
(7÷3)+(3)+(2÷3)+(9÷2)+(7÷2)+(8÷2)+(8÷2)+(8÷2)+(5÷2)+(7÷2)=32
(2)
81-70,81
137,11
(8÷1)+(7)+(8÷1)=23
(1÷1)+(73÷1)=74
(1) Adding together
(20.222×23.75)+(28.69×32)= 1398.35
(20.222+23.75)+(28.69×32)=962
(2)
(7×23)+(3×74)×4=1532
(7+23)+(3×74)×4=918
So, for 1.20°
1584-1532=52
So, for 1.43°
1398−1328=70
Even with a diagram error these numbers are produced, there is a difference of 70 giving a max tilt of 2054, a number of a 1km gnomon, and a difference of 52 with a max tilt of 2036, 918 which has appeared elsewhere with a monument from the same date (1 number out).
From 1980's tilt is declining, obliquity is increasing this by 5%. After 1364+10250 or 1620+10250 years, it decreases it by 5%. Then, for a further 1272 or 1016 years, obliquity reduces tilt by 5% before increasing it.
41000÷25772=1.5909
The difference off midpoint is 0.1855°, using these numbers produce the following.
(23.4385−23.253=0.1855°)
1.2+(0.1855)=1.3855°
1.2-(0.1855)=1.0145°
1.43+(0.1855)=1.6155°
1.43-(0.1855)=1.2445°
The forward alignment of 32.25 years (3÷60) can apply to any date from 2040-2055 so as to equal 1.91, but it is 2046, which is 1.9121.
(29.3599²×2046.2)÷922704=1.9121
2046.2−32.25=2013.95
It was suggested that this number was added to the current year (2019) giving 2051.25, but alignment peaked in the 1980s.
The earliest date minus 3÷60 is 2013.95.
This suggests that the builders of the carins used the last whole year available inside the ratio if this was what they were trying to do and that this was built at about the same time as Giza pyramids.
A possible solution could be the following, giving a play with numbers.
(0.000117×27)=0.003159
0.0001395°/year number (2.86/1.43 number)
(0.000117×29)=0.003393
×100=0.3393
0.000117°/year number (2.4/1.2 number)
Then, the forward alignment angle of 6° can be added, giving 6.3393°, this then is the quadratic of the Sphinx's angles and cubit. The 27 is a random number, and 29 is a planetary alignment rotation and another rotation 17+11.89. This is because Jupiter and Saturn align between the years 1984-1987 and interact to increase tilt.
Taking the earliest date again 2013.95-29=1984.75 and 2013.95-27=1986.75, (max tilt plus mid point for planetary alignment).
Conclusion
There is a difference from modern-day numbers and Bronze Age numbers for obliquity. This also applies to different monuments.
Modern-day numbers vary from 23.5-23.43, which is 0.07° and 598 years.
Numbers used from 2019 give a number 1584.5 years to midpoint and a peak of 6646 bc. This is slightly different from other monument numbers with a possible variation of 20 years.
23.4385−23.253=0.1855°
The inclusion of both 1.2° and 1.43° is that both might have been considered as obliquity at some time in the Bronze Age or before. This difference here is about 20 years. 1/43 is 931 km as a fraction of the circumference but also a ratio used on the Giza pyramids. It is possible people might have mistaken 1/43 and 0.1855° as both connecting to obliquity.
The number 0.1855 is connected to Khufu's pyramid chamber, a golden ratio circle, and 16.5, which is the tomb's volume.
Another interpretation of the numbers so that the 155° isn't 155 but 0.155 is the two numbers multipled by 1000 and converted into days. Taking the pairs as separate numbers, the following is produced.
(52×70)×1000=3640000
3640000÷3600=1011.11
1011.11÷168=6.018518
(1398+1584)÷1000=2.982
2.982−π=0.159
0.159×10
41000÷25772=1.5909
918÷962=0.954
So here 6 and 0185 are produced, 1/10 of obliquity/tilt ratio, and what could be 95%. This could be interrupted something like
the angle distance from midpoint is a rotation of the ratios because obliquity is subtracting.
Also, take the 0.1855 number and the angle but not as 155° but 154.5° (this is from obliquity at 0.1855°) a number is produced which is half a 62° rotation from +59° to -59°.
0.1855×1000=185.5
185.5−154.5=31
Rotation of cairn 62° is 31° about a mid point.
Another angle of the north cairn can be measured as 57° and the south as 52°.
Instead of them being referred to as north and south, the centre is the north or north star, possibly at maximum tilt, and the angles are stars aligned at that time (1985).
Coordinates 57.472531,-4.074775
So, two stars exist at these angles. One is
Beta Draconis and the other is Xi Draconis.
Beta Draconis
Right ascension 17h 30m 25.96170s
Declination +52° 18′ 04.9993″
Also called Rastaban, it is a yellow giant star of magnitude 2.8, 362 light-years from Earth. Its name shares a meaning with Thuban, "head of the serpent."
Xi Draconis
Right ascension 17h 53m 31.72962s
Declination +56° 52′ 21.5143″
A binary star in the northern circumpolar constellation of Draco, it is located at a distance of 112.5 light-years.
The Clava Cairn is a Bronze Age circular chamber tomb cairn named after the group of three cairns at Balnuaran of Clava to the east of Inverness in Scotland.
There are about 50 cairns of this kind in and about Inverness.
(Coordinates 57.472531,-4.074775)
Alignment
With Clava Cairns, there is an angle of 155° between the three, and they are forward aligned 20° for maximum tilt in the 1980's.
Of the three, one is considered as north, one as south and one with no entrance (centre).
There are angles produced between the stones, and their differences can be changed to fractions. The angles are measured about the north direction and then split from the entrance, left and right.
Alignment
With Clava Cairns, there is an angle of 155° between the three, and they are forward aligned 20° for maximum tilt in the 1980's.
Of the three, one is considered as north, one as south and one with no entrance (centre).
There are angles produced between the stones, and their differences can be changed to fractions. The angles are measured about the north direction and then split from the entrance, left and right.
Noughts are not considered as a number, and single figures are divided by one.
Two versions of interpretations exist (1) adding all stones and (2) only adding the stones not under trees (1,diagram 2,map), (these also produce a slightly different angle which is probably a diagram error).
Two versions of interpretations exist (1) adding all stones and (2) only adding the stones not under trees (1,diagram 2,map), (these also produce a slightly different angle which is probably a diagram error).
North (59°)
(1)
72,31,2,41-79,73,36,9,24,50
(41,29,39-60,6,37,27,33,26)
(7÷2)+(3÷1)+(1÷2)+(4÷1)+(7÷9)+(7÷3)+(3÷6)+(1÷9)+(2÷4)+(5)=20.222
(6÷2)+(3÷3)+(7÷2)+(7÷3)+(1÷6)+(6)+(9÷3)+(9÷2)+(1÷4)=23.75
(2)
40-75,69,35,3
65,6,34,32
4+(7÷5)+(6÷9)+(3÷5)+(1÷3)=7
(2÷3)+(4÷3)+(1÷6)+(5÷6)=3
South (54°)
(1)
55,82,73,45,17,11,39-68,80,50,13
27,25,28,28,28,27-29,32,30,37
(5÷5)+(8÷2)+(7÷3)+(4÷5)+(1÷7)+(1÷1)+(3÷9)+(6÷8)+(8)+(5)+(1÷3)=28.69
(7÷3)+(3)+(2÷3)+(9÷2)+(7÷2)+(8÷2)+(8÷2)+(8÷2)+(5÷2)+(7÷2)=32
(2)
81-70,81
137,11
(8÷1)+(7)+(8÷1)=23
(1÷1)+(73÷1)=74
(1) Adding together
(20.222×23.75)+(28.69×32)= 1398.35
(20.222+23.75)+(28.69×32)=962
(2)
(7×23)+(3×74)×4=1532
(7+23)+(3×74)×4=918
So, for 1.20°
1584-1532=52
So, for 1.43°
1398−1328=70
Even with a diagram error these numbers are produced, there is a difference of 70 giving a max tilt of 2054, a number of a 1km gnomon, and a difference of 52 with a max tilt of 2036, 918 which has appeared elsewhere with a monument from the same date (1 number out).
(Multiplying by 4 as they are segmented).
The numbers are put into fractions clockwise and then anti-clockwise, each are numbers that when added produce an answer.
It is possible to minus 6° from these numbers, but they are forward aligned, and it is the differences used. The numbers add up to 1398 and 962 a number associated with obliquity mid point and 1km gnomon (for 1.43°) and 1532/918 also a number associated with obliquity but nearer to what is considered as obliquity (for 1.2°).
Note
A rotation of the north Cairn by 62° anti-clockwise would rotate it -59° to 59°. A note that the increase in small stones around the perimeter above and buried just below the ground prevent the ingress of larger trees and if the soil has been compacted with the stones, large plants would also be hindered.
Obliquity
Obliquity also rarely aligns with maximum tilt and so aligns somewhere along its tilt. This is for both peak and mid point obliquity.
It is possible to minus 6° from these numbers, but they are forward aligned, and it is the differences used. The numbers add up to 1398 and 962 a number associated with obliquity mid point and 1km gnomon (for 1.43°) and 1532/918 also a number associated with obliquity but nearer to what is considered as obliquity (for 1.2°).
Note
A rotation of the north Cairn by 62° anti-clockwise would rotate it -59° to 59°. A note that the increase in small stones around the perimeter above and buried just below the ground prevent the ingress of larger trees and if the soil has been compacted with the stones, large plants would also be hindered.
Obliquity
Obliquity also rarely aligns with maximum tilt and so aligns somewhere along its tilt. This is for both peak and mid point obliquity.
(1.0145° is also a number associated with measurements per day)
Using the number 23.4385° and 23.253° as measured in 2019, then 35 years must be subtracted. The measurements per day number also happens to be 0.1855° from mid point and maximum tilt at 1985. It also happens to be 1/10 of 1.55°, or 155° the angle of separation divided by 1000.
(1.2−0.1855)=1.0145°
20−(1.2−0.1855)=18.9855°
(1.2−0.1855)=1.0145°
20−(1.2−0.1855)=18.9855°
0.1855÷1.2=0.15458
From 1980's tilt is declining, obliquity is increasing this by 5%. After 1364+10250 or 1620+10250 years, it decreases it by 5%. Then, for a further 1272 or 1016 years, obliquity reduces tilt by 5% before increasing it.
Assuming mid point is 23.253° then minusing 23.4385° equates to 0.1855° until mid point. This makes peak obliquity 6680 bc.
23.4385-23.253=0.1855°
0.1855÷1.2=0.15458
0.15458×10250=1584
So
10250−1584−1985=6681
0.15458×10250=1584
So
10250−1584−1985=6681
6681-35=6646 bc
41000÷25772=1.5909
The difference off midpoint is 0.1855°, using these numbers produce the following.
(23.4385−23.253=0.1855°)
1.2+(0.1855)=1.3855°
1.2-(0.1855)=1.0145°
1.43+(0.1855)=1.6155°
1.43-(0.1855)=1.2445°
The forward alignment of 32.25 years (3÷60) can apply to any date from 2040-2055 so as to equal 1.91, but it is 2046, which is 1.9121.
(29.3599²×2046.2)÷922704=1.9121
2046.2−32.25=2013.95
It was suggested that this number was added to the current year (2019) giving 2051.25, but alignment peaked in the 1980s.
The earliest date minus 3÷60 is 2013.95.
This suggests that the builders of the carins used the last whole year available inside the ratio if this was what they were trying to do and that this was built at about the same time as Giza pyramids.
A possible solution could be the following, giving a play with numbers.
(0.000117×27)=0.003159
0.0001395°/year number (2.86/1.43 number)
(0.000117×29)=0.003393
×100=0.3393
0.000117°/year number (2.4/1.2 number)
Then, the forward alignment angle of 6° can be added, giving 6.3393°, this then is the quadratic of the Sphinx's angles and cubit. The 27 is a random number, and 29 is a planetary alignment rotation and another rotation 17+11.89. This is because Jupiter and Saturn align between the years 1984-1987 and interact to increase tilt.
Taking the earliest date again 2013.95-29=1984.75 and 2013.95-27=1986.75, (max tilt plus mid point for planetary alignment).
Conclusion
There is a difference from modern-day numbers and Bronze Age numbers for obliquity. This also applies to different monuments.
Modern-day numbers vary from 23.5-23.43, which is 0.07° and 598 years.
Numbers used from 2019 give a number 1584.5 years to midpoint and a peak of 6646 bc. This is slightly different from other monument numbers with a possible variation of 20 years.
23.4385−23.253=0.1855°
The inclusion of both 1.2° and 1.43° is that both might have been considered as obliquity at some time in the Bronze Age or before. This difference here is about 20 years. 1/43 is 931 km as a fraction of the circumference but also a ratio used on the Giza pyramids. It is possible people might have mistaken 1/43 and 0.1855° as both connecting to obliquity.
The number 0.1855 is connected to Khufu's pyramid chamber, a golden ratio circle, and 16.5, which is the tomb's volume.
Another interpretation of the numbers so that the 155° isn't 155 but 0.155 is the two numbers multipled by 1000 and converted into days. Taking the pairs as separate numbers, the following is produced.
(52×70)×1000=3640000
3640000÷3600=1011.11
1011.11÷168=6.018518
(1398+1584)÷1000=2.982
2.982−π=0.159
0.159×10
41000÷25772=1.5909
918÷962=0.954
So here 6 and 0185 are produced, 1/10 of obliquity/tilt ratio, and what could be 95%. This could be interrupted something like
the angle distance from midpoint is a rotation of the ratios because obliquity is subtracting.
Also, take the 0.1855 number and the angle but not as 155° but 154.5° (this is from obliquity at 0.1855°) a number is produced which is half a 62° rotation from +59° to -59°.
0.1855×1000=185.5
185.5−154.5=31
Rotation of cairn 62° is 31° about a mid point.
Another angle of the north cairn can be measured as 57° and the south as 52°.
Instead of them being referred to as north and south, the centre is the north or north star, possibly at maximum tilt, and the angles are stars aligned at that time (1985).
Coordinates 57.472531,-4.074775
So, two stars exist at these angles. One is
Beta Draconis and the other is Xi Draconis.
Beta Draconis
Right ascension 17h 30m 25.96170s
Declination +52° 18′ 04.9993″
Also called Rastaban, it is a yellow giant star of magnitude 2.8, 362 light-years from Earth. Its name shares a meaning with Thuban, "head of the serpent."
Xi Draconis
Right ascension 17h 53m 31.72962s
Declination +56° 52′ 21.5143″
A binary star in the northern circumpolar constellation of Draco, it is located at a distance of 112.5 light-years.
Using these two star differences, a year of build could be 2924 bc. This is from subtracting, minutes and seconds, and gives, 23 and 5.7679.
23.4385-23.0913=0.342
Considering this number as obliquity derives 2924 bc.
(These are not in opposite directions as might have been thought but are both at right ascension 17hrs, this could be suggested from the entrance ways which are both towards the southwest)
So, using the interpretation, this is then the two stars around the North Star.
It pertains to be obliquity but is aligned at maximum tilt and might have another underlying meaning that isn't very clear.
(This though could be obliquity from maximum, suggesting the year. This could suggest 2924 years past 1985 (4909), and as tilt continues, it suggests it aligns again in 939 bc)
Comments
Post a Comment