Tomb of Ramesses IV The pharaoh Ramesses IV was buried in Tomb KV2, located in the Valley of the Kings, Egypt. The tombs of Ramesses II and VII are on either side. Ramesses died at the age of 27 in 1148 BC. He is connected to the Temple of Khonsu at Karnak. Coordinates 25.741530,32.602080 Description The tomb is of similar design to others in that it has a corridor to the burial chamber with side rooms. It is thought to be about 75 metres long and declines about 10 metres from the entrance. Chamber E, as the antechamber, has stars painted on the ceiling. Chamber K is built with side rooms, and the burial chamber J has a vaulted ceiling with astrological patterns along with the sarcophagus. Coptic monks were said to have lived in the tomb, and in the 19th century, explorers like Jean-François Champollion had camped there. Earlier, Romans were said to have left what is considered as graffiti in the tomb. Measurements These are the tombs' measurements in metres, including the a...
Moel Tŷ Uchaf
Moel Tŷ Uchaf is a monument near Corwen, Wales, and could date to about 1800 bc.
The circle is 12 metres in diameter, and Moel Tŷ Uchaf is also the name of the hill on which the circle is located.
Of the 41 stones on the circumference, one further stone is at stone 'ten' anti-clockwise (inside), and one stone is at 'eleven' clockwise (outside), making 43 in total.
The outside stone makes an angle of 19° with the centre and the inside stone an angle of 50°.
The stones can be considered as split 34/7 or 41/7, the latter is considered as the seven is separate but not minus making it a part of it, this then gives the number 5.857. This number produces a possible date along with the width from a 45 ft width.
41÷7=5.857
5.857÷1.55=3.778
3.778×1000=3778
3778-1985=1793 bc
Width
1200÷30.48=39.37
39.37-45=5.6299
5.6299÷1.55=3.632
3.632×1000=3632
3632-1985=1647 bc
Stones
Using the angle of 6° (5.857°) clockwise, the following are produced (measurements are from the centre of the stones).
Clockwise
1,0,1,0,0,0,0
Anti-clockwise
1,0,0,1,1,0,1
Two numbers are produced, and each can be applied either way (ratios). The numbers are interpreted as 10×10000 and 100×1101.
0.908×1793=1628
1647.21−1628=19
Using the 34÷7 and an angle of 4.857° the following are produced, but these don't equate with any numbers.
Clockwise
1,1,0,0,1,1,1
Anti-clockwise
1,0,1,1,1,0,0
Distance
Using an accurate measurement to define the distance, the following are produced from their coordinates below.
Thornborough Henges
54.210136,-1.564022
Moel Tŷ Uchaf
52.923643,-3.405466
The distance is 187.7 km at an angle of 49.545°, and the area of the triangle 122kms by 143kms is 8698 km². When subtracted from 6642 and 1985, if considering it as a date, then 71.163 is produced.
8698.163−6642=2056.163
2056.163-1985=71.163
The difference off the value produced.
71.1631−65.825=5.338
The difference off cms/ft and cms/s of the distance in cms (this value is then used above).
18771030÷5280=3555.12
18771030÷3600=5214.175
(65.825 ft or 20.06m is the shortfall)
Using the two new numbers, 5.338 and 45.0757, in a triangle, the length of 3.77 units is produced, which suggests a form of measurement.
Conclusion
Due to the suspected date of 1800 bc, this would align the monument with the Thornborough Henges. This is mostly from the angle 49.545° which is angled towards the northeast.
As the number produced when using the 6° angle gives the inside and outside stone's location with the same ratio, it shows that this is correct but the angle is probably 5.857° derived from 7 from 41 stones (41÷7).
Overall, the angle and some form of measurement for distance would put it as a marker, which would also date it about the same date of 1800 bc.
Moel Tŷ Uchaf is a monument near Corwen, Wales, and could date to about 1800 bc.
The circle is 12 metres in diameter, and Moel Tŷ Uchaf is also the name of the hill on which the circle is located.
Of the 41 stones on the circumference, one further stone is at stone 'ten' anti-clockwise (inside), and one stone is at 'eleven' clockwise (outside), making 43 in total.
The outside stone makes an angle of 19° with the centre and the inside stone an angle of 50°.
The stones can be considered as split 34/7 or 41/7, the latter is considered as the seven is separate but not minus making it a part of it, this then gives the number 5.857. This number produces a possible date along with the width from a 45 ft width.
41÷7=5.857
5.857÷1.55=3.778
3.778×1000=3778
3778-1985=1793 bc
Width
1200÷30.48=39.37
39.37-45=5.6299
5.6299÷1.55=3.632
3.632×1000=3632
3632-1985=1647 bc
Stones
Using the angle of 6° (5.857°) clockwise, the following are produced (measurements are from the centre of the stones).
Clockwise
1,0,1,0,0,0,0
Anti-clockwise
1,0,0,1,1,0,1
Two numbers are produced, and each can be applied either way (ratios). The numbers are interpreted as 10×10000 and 100×1101.
One ratio is multipled by 45 and gives the angle for the inside stone. The other ratio is multipled by 1793, then subtracted from 1647, giving 19, and this is the outside stone's angle to the centre.
110100÷100000=1.101
100000÷110100=0.9082
1.101×45=49.545
100000÷110100=0.9082
1.101×45=49.545
0.908×1793=1628
1647.21−1628=19
Using the 34÷7 and an angle of 4.857° the following are produced, but these don't equate with any numbers.
Clockwise
1,1,0,0,1,1,1
Anti-clockwise
1,0,1,1,1,0,0
Distance
Using an accurate measurement to define the distance, the following are produced from their coordinates below.
Thornborough Henges
54.210136,-1.564022
Moel Tŷ Uchaf
52.923643,-3.405466
The distance is 187.7 km at an angle of 49.545°, and the area of the triangle 122kms by 143kms is 8698 km². When subtracted from 6642 and 1985, if considering it as a date, then 71.163 is produced.
8698.163−6642=2056.163
2056.163-1985=71.163
The difference off the value produced.
71.1631−65.825=5.338
The difference off cms/ft and cms/s of the distance in cms (this value is then used above).
18771030÷5280=3555.12
18771030÷3600=5214.175
(65.825 ft or 20.06m is the shortfall)
Using the two new numbers, 5.338 and 45.0757, in a triangle, the length of 3.77 units is produced, which suggests a form of measurement.
Dividing the distance already measured by this value of 3.77 gives a number very near to the angle.
187.7÷3.77=49.788
(There is a 0.243 difference)
Also, because the 3.77 number has already been produced, it is then multipled by cms in a foot. Suggesting a possible pyramid connection, when subtracting from the width of Khufu's pyramid, produces a similar number from the difference from a side length of 0.4508.
18771030÷5280=3555.12
3555.12-3600=45.0757
3.77×30.48=114.9096
114.9096×2=229.8192
229.8192−230.27=0.4508
Because the difference has already appeared, the ratio is applied to the angle 5.857° and the following is produced.
1.101÷0.9082=1.2123
1.2123×5.857=7.1004
7.1004÷1.55=4.58
4.5809×1000=4580.9
4580.9−1985=2596 bc
3555.12-3600=45.0757
3.77×30.48=114.9096
114.9096×2=229.8192
229.8192−230.27=0.4508
Because the difference has already appeared, the ratio is applied to the angle 5.857° and the following is produced.
1.101÷0.9082=1.2123
1.2123×5.857=7.1004
7.1004÷1.55=4.58
4.5809×1000=4580.9
4580.9−1985=2596 bc
Using the new number of 5.338°
1.2123×5.338=6.47
6.47÷1.55=4.175
4.175×1000=4175
4175-1985=2190 bc
Conclusion
Due to the suspected date of 1800 bc, this would align the monument with the Thornborough Henges. This is mostly from the angle 49.545° which is angled towards the northeast.
As the number produced when using the 6° angle gives the inside and outside stone's location with the same ratio, it shows that this is correct but the angle is probably 5.857° derived from 7 from 41 stones (41÷7).
Overall, the angle and some form of measurement for distance would put it as a marker, which would also date it about the same date of 1800 bc.
The unit value of 3.77 is achieved after knowing the distance of 187.7 km but can be directly achieved immediately from the number of stones and converting as if tilt.
(41÷7)÷1.55=3.778
(This is not an obvious form of measurement. Using 3.778° produces a distance of 187.2 km)
This then suggests that Moel Tŷ Uchaf was built after Thornborough Henges as an elaborate marker with no other purpose then the angle of 49.545° which would of been installed after 1800 bc or it was built earlier during Neolithic times and it also had the purpose of a direction at 49.545° but to a Neolithic settlement of some importance in the same location as Thornborough Henges.
There are Neolithic settlements and markers known in the area, and one of these markers was used for the building of the Druid's Henge. There is also a connection to Khufu's pyramid but this could just be for using obliquity but nonetheless a possibility exists of a date about the time of construction of the pyramids along with 3.77/115/230 and 45.0757, were a number of 9×π×1.618 equals 45.75 and was used as a radius in a circle that connected both π and 1.618 at 45°.
This then suggests that Moel Tŷ Uchaf was built after Thornborough Henges as an elaborate marker with no other purpose then the angle of 49.545° which would of been installed after 1800 bc or it was built earlier during Neolithic times and it also had the purpose of a direction at 49.545° but to a Neolithic settlement of some importance in the same location as Thornborough Henges.
There are Neolithic settlements and markers known in the area, and one of these markers was used for the building of the Druid's Henge. There is also a connection to Khufu's pyramid but this could just be for using obliquity but nonetheless a possibility exists of a date about the time of construction of the pyramids along with 3.77/115/230 and 45.0757, were a number of 9×π×1.618 equals 45.75 and was used as a radius in a circle that connected both π and 1.618 at 45°.
Comments
Post a Comment